Rationality and mimesis: Adorno"s theory of aesthetic modernity.
Read Online

Rationality and mimesis: Adorno"s theory of aesthetic modernity.

  • 66 Want to read
  • ·
  • 62 Currently reading

Published .
Written in English

Book details:

The Physical Object
Pagination40 leaves
Number of Pages40
ID Numbers
Open LibraryOL18710578M

Download Rationality and mimesis: Adorno"s theory of aesthetic modernity.


  According to Lambert Zuidervaart, mimesis in Aesthetic Theory refers to "an archaic openness to the other, to the disparate and diffuse and contrary;" mimetic openness, which, because of the condition of total reification in capitalist society, has been driven away from everyday experience as well as from rational knowledge production, "lives. on aesthetics he gave at Frankfurt University during , while engaged in the writing of Aesthetic Theory, Adorno further expanded on the nature of such explication. He saw its purpose as twofold: 1) to interpret the art work (both in terms of 'immanent analysis' and in terms of the relation to society); and 2) to develop the concept of. Theodor W. Adorno's aesthetics has dominated discussions about art and aesthetic modernism since World War II, and continues to inform contemporary theorizing. Situating Adorno's aesthetic theory in the context of post-Kantian European philosophy, Espen Hammer explores Adorno's critical view of art as engaged in reconsidering fundamental Cited by: 2. This is an introduction to the aesthetics and sociology of music of the German philosopher and music theorist T. W. Adorno. Its main aim is to offer a conceptual context within which to situate Adorno's writings on music. Starting with a thematic survey of the early writings from the s the music of Bartok, Hindemith, Stravinsky and the Second Viennese School is discussed in relation to the.

One of the most central concepts of Adorno’s aesthetic theory is that of mimesis. It is, perhaps, surprising to find this concept – so deeply associated with a debate in ancient philosophy – employed in the context of a new theory of aesthetic modernism, one conceived within the intellectual space of critical theory.   Theodor was one of the towering intellectuals of the twentieth century. His contributions cover such a myriad of fields, including the sociology of culture, social theory, the philosophy of music, ethics, art and aesthetics, film, ideology, the critique of modernity and musical composition, that it is difficult to assimilate the sheer range and profundity of his achievement. Aesthetic pleasure is neither passive, nor theoretically or practically cognitive, and yet, it is an exercise of rational agency by virtue of belonging to a domain of rationality that is largely. Mimesis thus resists theory and constructs a world of illusion, appearances, aesthetics, and images in which existing worlds are appropriated, changed, and re-interpreted. Images are a part of our material existence, but also mimetically bind our experience of reality to subjectivity and connote a “sensuous experience that is beyond reference.

Bridges the gap between the history and theory of twentieth-century architecture and cultural theories of modernity. In this exploration of the relationship between modernity, dwelling, and architecture, Hilde Heynen attempts to bridge the gap between the discourse of the modern movement and cultural theories of modernity. On one hand, she discusses architecture from the perspective of. Mimesis is one of the oldest and most central terms in literary, art and media theory. The term mimesis (Greek: __ from __) is often translated in English as “imitation” or “representation.” The word has been used to describe the relation between an original object and a . Film-Philosophy () Film-Philosophy ISSN Mimesis Reconsidered: Adorno and Tarkovsky contra Habermas Simon Mussell1 In what follows I offer a reconsideration of the complex concept of mimesis, as it is deployed in the critical theory of Theodor W. Adorno, which, I argue.   Mimesis plays a crucial and highly contested role in the dialogue as a whole, figuring centrally in Books II, III, and X. Socrates picks up his earlier discussion of it in the tenth and final book in the light the intervening discussion in books IV through IX of the role of justice in an ideal city and in the well-balanced individual psyche.